be Charged with Murdering his Wife?

There’s federal law and then there’s state law. Brian may face criminal liability for murder under both. Massachusetts doesn’t have the death penalty, but the federal system does. Most murder cases are prosecuted under state law and in state court. Under some circumstances, however, murder is a federal crime, and the case is heard in a federal court and subject to federal sentencing.   That’s where the death penalty comes into play.

So how exactly could Brian be tried in a federal court for murder?  Turns out that back in June, during his sentencing hearing and apparently “moments away from pronouncing sentence,” the federal court suspended the hearing to allow the government to investigate whether Walshe had violated the terms of his pre-sentence release. The allegations made by the government were that while he was on pre-sentence release, Brian obstructed justice and committed separate crimes in connection with a probate case involving his deceased father.  That’s in fact still under investigation.

This is pure speculation, but if the motive for Ana’s murder was to prevent her from testifying or from providing evidence of Brian’s non-compliance with the terms of his pre-sentence release—that is, if she knew about any crimes he committed during the probate of his father’s estate—then Brian may face murder charges under the federal witness tampering statute, which is punishable by death.

So far, Ana Walshe’s body hasn’t been found.  So, what does that mean for Brian? Criminal cases require evidence. In the case of murder, there must be evidence that a human being has died. To prove a case, the prosecution must have the corpus delicti—Latin for “body of the crime.”  There must be sufficient evidence to show that the alleged victim is indeed dead. That’s no difficult task when the police have a dead body. But when they haven’t, other types of evidence must be used to show that a death has occurred. A confession, for example, may help satisfy that burden, though the law requires that some additional evidence corroborates the confession.

As of right now, there’s no direct evidence that Ana Walshe is dead.  But there may be some circumstantial evidence that she is. If, for example, the discovered blood is positively identified as Ana’s and the broken knife has traces of her blood on it, one can infer that it got there because she was cut by the knife. If the authorities can piece enough of this type of evidence together, they may be able to show, circumstantially, that Ana is dead and that the corpus delicti rule has been satisfied. The bottom line is that if investigators amass enough circumstantial evidence, Brian could be charged with murdering his wife, even if they cannot find the body.